<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MSF Topic:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10144/12518</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:10:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-18T13:10:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Snakebite on the hand: Lessons from two clinical cases illustrating difficulties of Surgical Indication</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10144/279015</link>
      <description>Title: Snakebite on the hand: Lessons from two clinical cases illustrating difficulties of Surgical Indication
Authors: Gras, S</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10144/279015</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-12-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amputation in emergency situations: indications, techniques and Médecins Sans Frontières France's experience in Haiti</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10144/280916</link>
      <description>Title: Amputation in emergency situations: indications, techniques and Médecins Sans Frontières France's experience in Haiti
Authors: Herard, Patrick; Boillot, François
Abstract: PURPOSE: The decision to amputate is always difficult but becomes even harder in emergency situations, which usually present extra complicating factors. MSF EXPERIENCE: These include human factors (related to both the surgeon and the patient); poor or nonexistent medical facilities, especially in war conditions or resource-poor countries; and cultural and religious considerations. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) has developed a quick medical and logistical response that relies on surgical protocols adapted to emergency situations, together with complete "kits" of medical equipment, supplies and inflatable facilities. CONCLUSION: Our response to Haiti's 2010 earthquake relied on these tools but also highlighted the need to develop more detailed protocols that will help our teams on the ground.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10144/280916</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-05-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reconstruction of Nonunion Tibial Fractures in War-Wounded Iraqi Civilians, 2006-2008: Better Late Than Never</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10144/255400</link>
      <description>Title: Reconstruction of Nonunion Tibial Fractures in War-Wounded Iraqi Civilians, 2006-2008: Better Late Than Never
Authors: Fakri, Rasheed M; Al Ani, Ali M K; Rose, Angela M C; Alras, Majd S; Daumas, Laurent; Baron, Emmanuel; Khaddaj, Sinan; Hérard, Patrick
Abstract: OBJECTIVE:: To describe medical care and surgical outcome after functional reconstructive surgery in late-presenting patients who already had at least one prior operation. DESIGN:: Retrospective review of medical care and surgical outcome from August 2006 to December 2008 using patient records for initial data with active follow-up for the latest outcome information. SETTING:: Médecins sans Frontières surgical programme in Jordan Red Crescent Hospital, Amman, Jordan. PATIENTS:: Sixty-two civilians with nonunion tibial fractures caused by war-related trauma in Iraq; 53 completed follow-up. INTERVENTION:: Amputation and/or reconstruction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:: Late surgical complications (after the patient's return to Iraq) were analyzed for infection recurrence, bone union, and functional condition (defined using the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment score). RESULTS:: Almost three fourths of patients arrived with infected injuries, nine of whom had amputation as the initial surgery; the rest, and all uninfected patients, had reconstruction. Excluding loss to follow-up, only four of 53 (8%) patients who arrived with an infected injury had infection recurrence. Excluding loss to follow-up and amputation, two of 14 (14%) patients in the uninfected and five of 30 (17%) in the infected injury group did not achieve successful tibial union. Mean Dysfunctional and Bothersome Indices overall were 27.1 and 29.8, respectively, with similar results for all three groups (amputations, uninfected, and infected injuries). CONCLUSIONS:: Our study shows that patients with infected and uninfected injuries surgically treated in Amman achieved similar outcomes. Despite late presentation, our patients had a comparable outcome to other studies dealing with early reconstruction. Reconstruction for the infected group required longer treatment time.
Description: Article approval pending</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10144/255400</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-01-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Providing surgical care in Somalia: A model of task shifting.</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10144/203618</link>
      <description>Title: Providing surgical care in Somalia: A model of task shifting.
Authors: Chu, Kathryn M; Ford, Nathan P; Trelles, Miguel
Abstract: ABSTRACT:</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10144/203618</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

