Questionable Accountability: MSF and Sphere in 2003.

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10144/17742
Title:
Questionable Accountability: MSF and Sphere in 2003.
Authors:
Tong, J
Journal:
Disasters
Abstract:
This article examines the relationship between Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) and the Sphere Project. Prior to revisiting the concerns MSF had with the project, it looks at factors that give rise to differences between NGOs and cites some reasons for why an organisation such as MSF would not embrace such a project and clarifies some key elements of MSF-style humanitarianism. The author revisits the original concerns and arguments presented by MSF when it decided not to participate beyond assisting with the establishment of technical standards and key indicators for the handbook. This is followed by a critical discussion examining these concerns and counter-criticism with reference to experiences a few years after the inception of Sphere. It concludes with MSF's perceptions and stance regarding Sphere and accountability in 2003.
Affiliation:
Programmes Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières UK, 3rd Floor, 67-74 Saffron Hill, London EC1N 8QX, UK. jacqui.TONG@london.msf.org
Publisher:
Published by Wiley-Blackwell
Issue Date:
Jun-2004
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10144/17742
DOI:
10.1111/j.0361-3666.2004.00251.x
PubMed ID:
15186363
Additional Links:
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/DISA
Language:
en
ISSN:
0361-3666
Appears in Collections:
Nutrition

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorTong, J-
dc.date.accessioned2008-02-07T16:48:24Z-
dc.date.available2008-02-07T16:48:24Z-
dc.date.issued2004-06-
dc.identifier.citationQuestionable Accountability: MSF and Sphere in 2003. 2004, 28 (2):176-89notDisastersen
dc.identifier.issn0361-3666-
dc.identifier.pmid15186363-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.0361-3666.2004.00251.x-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10144/17742-
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the relationship between Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) and the Sphere Project. Prior to revisiting the concerns MSF had with the project, it looks at factors that give rise to differences between NGOs and cites some reasons for why an organisation such as MSF would not embrace such a project and clarifies some key elements of MSF-style humanitarianism. The author revisits the original concerns and arguments presented by MSF when it decided not to participate beyond assisting with the establishment of technical standards and key indicators for the handbook. This is followed by a critical discussion examining these concerns and counter-criticism with reference to experiences a few years after the inception of Sphere. It concludes with MSF's perceptions and stance regarding Sphere and accountability in 2003.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPublished by Wiley-Blackwell-
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/DISA-
dc.rightsArchived on this site with the kind permission of Wiley-Blackwellen
dc.subject.meshAltruismen
dc.subject.meshHumansen
dc.subject.meshInternational Cooperationen
dc.subject.meshRelief Worken
dc.subject.meshWorld Healthen
dc.titleQuestionable Accountability: MSF and Sphere in 2003.en
dc.contributor.departmentProgrammes Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières UK, 3rd Floor, 67-74 Saffron Hill, London EC1N 8QX, UK. jacqui.TONG@london.msf.orgen
dc.identifier.journalDisastersen
All Items in MSF are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.