Comparison of methods to correct survival estimates and survival regression analysis on a large HIV African cohort

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10144/242361
Title:
Comparison of methods to correct survival estimates and survival regression analysis on a large HIV African cohort
Authors:
Henriques, Julie; Pujades-Rodriguez, Mar; McGuire, Megan; Szumilin, Elisabeth; Iwaz, Jean; Etard, Jean-François; Ecochard, René
Journal:
PloS One
Abstract:
The evaluation of HIV treatment programs is generally based on an estimation of survival among patients receiving antiretroviral treatment (ART). In large HIV programs, loss to follow-up (LFU) rates remain high despite active patient tracing, which is likely to bias survival estimates and survival regression analyses.
Affiliation:
Service de Biostatistique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France; Equipe Biostatistique-Santé, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Unité Mixte de Recherche 5558 Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Epicentre, Paris, France; Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement-Université de Montpellier Unité Mixte Internationale 233 TransVIHMI, Montpellier, France
Publisher:
PLoS
Issue Date:
2012
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10144/242361
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0031706
PubMed ID:
22384061
Additional Links:
http://www.plosone.org/article/citationList.action?articleURI=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031706
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
1932-6203
Appears in Collections:
HIV/AIDS

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorHenriques, Julieen_GB
dc.contributor.authorPujades-Rodriguez, Maren_GB
dc.contributor.authorMcGuire, Meganen_GB
dc.contributor.authorSzumilin, Elisabethen_GB
dc.contributor.authorIwaz, Jeanen_GB
dc.contributor.authorEtard, Jean-Françoisen_GB
dc.contributor.authorEcochard, Renéen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-10T19:40:18Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-10T19:40:18Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE 7(2): e31706. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031706en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.pmid22384061-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0031706-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10144/242361-
dc.description.abstractThe evaluation of HIV treatment programs is generally based on an estimation of survival among patients receiving antiretroviral treatment (ART). In large HIV programs, loss to follow-up (LFU) rates remain high despite active patient tracing, which is likely to bias survival estimates and survival regression analyses.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPLoSen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.plosone.org/article/citationList.action?articleURI=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031706en_GB
dc.rightsPublished by Public Library of Science, [url]http://www.plosone.org/[/url] Archived on this site by Open Access permissionen_GB
dc.subjectHIVen_GB
dc.subjectMethodsen_GB
dc.titleComparison of methods to correct survival estimates and survival regression analysis on a large HIV African cohorten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentService de Biostatistique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France; Equipe Biostatistique-Santé, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Unité Mixte de Recherche 5558 Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Epicentre, Paris, France; Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement-Université de Montpellier Unité Mixte Internationale 233 TransVIHMI, Montpellier, Franceen_GB
dc.identifier.journalPloS Oneen_GB

Related articles on PubMed

All Items in MSF are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.