MSF Field Research >
1 Published Research and Commentary >
Directly observed antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
this identifier to cite or link
to this item:
|Download this article:|
|Ford Lancet DOTS for ARV Review.pdf||193Kb||Adobe PDF|
|Title: ||Directly observed antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.|
|Affiliation: ||Médecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.|
|Citation: ||Directly observed antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. 2009: Lancet|
|Issue Date: ||30-Nov-2009 |
|PubMed ID: ||19954833|
|Abstract: ||BACKGROUND: Directly observed therapy has been recommended to improve adherence for patients with HIV infection who are on highly active antiretroviral therapy, but the benefit and cost-effectiveness of this approach has not been established conclusively. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials of directly observed versus self-administered antiretroviral treatment. METHODS: We did duplicate searches of databases (from inception to July 27, 2009), searchable websites of major HIV conferences (up to July, 2009), and lay publications and websites (March-July, 2009) to identify randomised trials assessing directly observed therapy to promote adherence to antiretroviral therapy in adults. Our primary outcome was virological suppression at study completion. We calculated relative risks (95% CIs), and pooled estimates using a random-effects method. FINDINGS: 12 studies met our inclusion criteria; four of these were done in groups that were judged to be at high risk of poor adherence (drug users and homeless people). Ten studies reported on the primary outcome (n=1862 participants); we calculated a pooled relative risk of 1.04 (95% CI 0.91-1.20, p=0.55), and noted moderate heterogeneity between the studies (I(2)= 53.8%, 95% CI 0-75.7, p=0.0247) for directly observed versus self-administered treatment. INTERPRETATION: Directly observed antiretroviral therapy seems to offer no benefit over self-administered treatment, which calls into question the use of such an approach to support adherence in the general patient population. FUNDING: None.|
|Rights: ||Reproduced on this site with permission of Elsevier Ltd. Please see http://www.thelancet.com/ for further relevant comment.|
|Appears in topics: ||HIV/AIDS|
|Related articles on PubMed|
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.
Marshall M, Crowther R, Almaraz-Serrano A, Creed F, Sledge W, Kluiter H, Roberts C, Hill E, Wiersma D, Bond GR, Huxley P, Tyrer P
|See all 64 articles|
All Items in MSF are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.