Browsing Malaria by Authors
In vivo parasitological measures of artemisinin susceptibilityStepniewska, Kasia; Ashley, Elizabeth; Lee, Sue J; Anstey, Nicholas; Barnes, Karen I; Binh, Tran Quang; D'Alessandro, Umberto; Day, Nicholas P J; de Vries, Peter J; Dorsey, Grant; Guthmann, Jean-Paul; Mayxay, Mayfong; Newton, Paul N; Olliaro, Piero; Osorio, Lyda; Price, Ric N; Rowland, Mark; Smithuis, Frank; Taylor, Walter R J; Nosten, François; White, Nicholas J; Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mae Sot, Thailand; Menzies School of Health Research and Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Australia; Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University (2010-01-19)Parasite clearance data from 18,699 patients with falciparum malaria treated with an artemisinin derivative in areas of low (n=14,539), moderate (n=2077), and high (n=2083) levels of malaria transmission across the world were analyzed to determine the factors that affect clearance rates and identify a simple in vivo screening measure for artemisinin resistance. The main factor affecting parasite clearance time was parasite density on admission. Clearance rates were faster in high-transmission settings and with more effective partner drugs in artemisinin-based combination treatments (ACTs). The result of the malaria blood smear on day 3 (72 h) was a good predictor of subsequent treatment failure and provides a simple screening measure for artemisinin resistance. Artemisinin resistance is highly unlikely if the proportion of patients with parasite densities of <100,000 parasites/microL given the currently recommended 3-day ACT who have a positive smear result on day 3 is <3%; that is, for n patients the observed number with a positive smear result on day 3 does not exceed (n + 60)/24.