AffiliationMédecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium.
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractA retrospective non-randomized study, comparing primary repair with colostomy, was made on a series of 102 patients with penetrating intraperitoneal colon injuries, in a war surgery programme in Cambodia. The overall case fatality rate (CFR) was 25.5%, whereas in the primary repair group CFR was 20%, compared to 30.8% in the colostomy group. The difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.30). Adjustment for possible confounding factors in the two groups did not alter the results. Considering the numerous advantages to the patient of a primary closure in the precarious situations where war surgery is often performed, this technique merits consideration.
- Outcomes of primary repair and primary anastomosis in war-related colon injuries.
- Authors: Vertrees A, Wakefield M, Pickett C, Greer L, Wilson A, Gillern S, Nelson J, Aydelotte J, Stojadinovic A, Shriver C
- Issue date: 2009 May
- Identifying the low-risk patient with penetrating colonic injury for selective use of primary repair.
- Authors: Schultz SC, Magnant CM, Richman MF, Holt RW, Evans SR
- Issue date: 1993 Sep
- A ten-year study of penetrating injuries of the colon.
- Authors: Adesanya AA, Ekanem EE
- Issue date: 2004 Dec
- War injuries of the colon and rectum.
- Authors: Kovacić D, Lovrić Z, Kondza G
- Issue date: 1994 Jul
- The role of primary repair for colonic injuries in wartime.
- Authors: Hudolin T, Hudolin I
- Issue date: 2005 May