Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAli, E*
dc.contributor.authorZachariah, R*
dc.contributor.authorHinderaker, S G*
dc.contributor.authorSatyanarayana, S*
dc.contributor.authorKizito, W*
dc.contributor.authorAlders, P*
dc.contributor.authorShams, Z*
dc.contributor.authorAllaouna, M*
dc.contributor.authorDraguez, B*
dc.contributor.authorDelchevalerie, P*
dc.contributor.authorEnarson, D A*
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-13T19:08:11Z
dc.date.available2013-02-13T19:08:11Z
dc.date.issued2012-12
dc.identifier.citationDoes the 65 cm height cut-off as age proxy exclude children eligible for nutritional assessment in Bangladesh? 2012, 2 (4):103 Public Health Actionen_GB
dc.identifier.issn22208372
dc.identifier.issn22208372
dc.identifier.doi10.5588/pha.12.0037
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10144/269533
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTB Unionen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://openurl.ingenta.com/content/xref?genre=article&issn=2220-8372&volume=2&issue=4&spage=103en_GB
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Public Health Actionen_GB
dc.titleDoes the 65 cm height cut-off as age proxy exclude children eligible for nutritional assessment in Bangladesh?en
dc.identifier.journalPublic Health Actionen_GB
refterms.dateFOA2019-03-04T10:16:04Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Ali E et al Height stick in ...
Size:
746.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record