• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • 1 Published Research and Commentary
    • Health Politics
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • 1 Published Research and Commentary
    • Health Politics
    • View Item
    Jan 16, 2021
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of MSFTitleAuthorsSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsSubjectsPublisherJournal

    The 'Indirect Costs' of Underfunding Foreign Partners in Global Health Research: A Case Study

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Crane, J
    Andia B
    Fouad, T
    Boum, Y
    R Bangsberg, D
    Issue Date
    2017-09-16
    Submitted date
    2017-09-26
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Journal
    Global Public Health
    Abstract
    This study of a global health research partnership assesses how U.S. fiscal administrative policies impact capacity building at foreign partner institutions. We conducted a case study of a research collaboration between Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST) in Mbarara, Uganda, and originally the University of California San Francisco (UCSF), but now Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Our case study is based on three of the authors' experiences directing and working with this partnership from its inception in 2003 through 2015. The collaboration established an independent Ugandan non-profit to act as a local fiscal agent and grants administrator and to assure compliance with the Ugandan labour and tax law. This structure, combined with low indirect cost reimbursements from U.S. federal grants, failed to strengthen institutional capacity at MUST. In response to problems with this model, the collaboration established a contracts and grants office at MUST. This office has built administrative capacity at MUST but has also generated new risks and expenses for MGH. We argue that U.S. fiscal administrative practices may drain rather than build capacity at African universities by underfunding the administrative costs of global health research, circumventing host country institutions, and externalising legal and financial risks associated with international work.
    Publisher
    Taylor & Francis
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10144/619025
    DOI
    10.1080/17441692.2017.1372504
    PubMed ID
    28920518
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    1744-1706
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1080/17441692.2017.1372504
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Health Politics

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Building a global surgery initiative through evaluation, collaboration, and training: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience.
    • Authors: Chao TE, Riesel JN, Anderson GA, Mullen JT, Doyle J, Briggs SM, Lillemoe KD, Goldstein C, Kitya D, Cusack JC Jr
    • Issue date: 2015 Jul-Aug
    • Science-based health innovation in Uganda: creative strategies for applying research to development.
    • Authors: Kamunyori S, Al-Bader S, Sewankambo N, Singer PA, Daar AS
    • Issue date: 2010 Dec 13
    • Global medical education partnerships to expand specialty expertise: a case report on building neurology clinical and research capacity.
    • Authors: Kaddumukasa M, Katabira E, Salata RA, Costa MA, Ddumba E, Furlan A, Kakooza-Mwesige A, Kamya MR, Kayima J, Longenecker CT, Mayanja-Kizza H, Mondo C, Moore S, Pundik S, Sewankambo N, Simon DI, Smyth KA, Sajatovic M
    • Issue date: 2014 Dec 30
    • Capacity building for child health: Canadian paediatricians in Uganda.
    • Authors: Brenner JL, Godel JC
    • Issue date: 2005 May
    • Nottingham Trent University and Makerere University School of Public Health partnership: experiences of co-learning and supporting the healthcare system in Uganda.
    • Authors: Musoke D, Gibson L, Mukama T, Khalil Y, Ssempebwa JC
    • Issue date: 2016 Mar 28
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.