Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStellmach, D
dc.contributor.authorBeshar, I
dc.contributor.authorBedford, J
dc.contributor.authordu Cros, P
dc.contributor.authorStringer, B
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-06T21:02:59Z
dc.date.available2018-04-06T21:02:59Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-25
dc.date.submitted2018-04-06
dc.identifier.citationAnthropology in public health emergencies:what is anthropology good for? 2018, 3 (2):e000534 BMJ Glob Healthen
dc.identifier.issn2059-7908
dc.identifier.pmid29607097
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000534
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10144/619085
dc.description.abstractRecent outbreaks of Ebola virus disease (2013-2016) and Zika virus (2015-2016) bring renewed recognition of the need to understand social pathways of disease transmission and barriers to care. Social scientists, anthropologists in particular, have been recognised as important players in disease outbreak response because of their ability to assess social, economic and political factors in local contexts. However, in emergency public health response, as with any interdisciplinary setting, different professions may disagree over methods, ethics and the nature of evidence itself. A disease outbreak is no place to begin to negotiate disciplinary differences. Given increasing demand for anthropologists to work alongside epidemiologists, clinicians and public health professionals in health crises, this paper gives a basic introduction to anthropological methods and seeks to bridge the gap in disciplinary expectations within emergencies. It asks: 'What can anthropologists do in a public health crisis and how do they do it?' It argues for an interdisciplinary conception of emergency and the recognition that social, psychological and institutional factors influence all aspects of care.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to BMJ Global Healthen
dc.titleAnthropology in public health emergencies:what is anthropology good for?en
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Global Healthen
refterms.dateFOA2019-03-04T13:46:32Z
html.description.abstractRecent outbreaks of Ebola virus disease (2013-2016) and Zika virus (2015-2016) bring renewed recognition of the need to understand social pathways of disease transmission and barriers to care. Social scientists, anthropologists in particular, have been recognised as important players in disease outbreak response because of their ability to assess social, economic and political factors in local contexts. However, in emergency public health response, as with any interdisciplinary setting, different professions may disagree over methods, ethics and the nature of evidence itself. A disease outbreak is no place to begin to negotiate disciplinary differences. Given increasing demand for anthropologists to work alongside epidemiologists, clinicians and public health professionals in health crises, this paper gives a basic introduction to anthropological methods and seeks to bridge the gap in disciplinary expectations within emergencies. It asks: 'What can anthropologists do in a public health crisis and how do they do it?' It argues for an interdisciplinary conception of emergency and the recognition that social, psychological and institutional factors influence all aspects of care.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Stellmach et al - 2018 - Anthr ...
Size:
203.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record