Wishful thinking versus operational commitment: is the international guidance on priority sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian settings becoming unrealistic?
Journal
Conflict and HealthAbstract
Twenty-one years ago, a global consortium of like-minded institutions designed the landmark Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health (SRH) to guide national and international humanitarian first responders in preventing morbidity and mortality at the onset of chaos, destruction, and high insecurity caused by disasters or conflicts. Since then, the MISP has undergone limited change and has become an international reference in humanitarian response. This article discusses our perspectives regarding the 2018 changes to the MISP that have created division among humanitarian field practitioners, academics, advocates, and development agencies. With more than 50 pages, the new MISP chapter dilutes key guidance and messages on the most life-saving activities, leaving actors with excessive room for interpretation as to which priority activities need to be first implemented. Consequently, non-life-saving interventions may take precedence over essential ones. Insecurity, scarce human and financial resources, logistics constrains, and other limitations imposed by field reality at the onset of a crisis must be considered. We strongly recommend that an institution with the mandate, legitimacy, and technical expertise in the review of guidelines reexamines the 2018 edition of the MISP. We urge experienced first-line responders, national actors, and relevant agencies to join efforts to ensure that the MISP remains focused on a very limited set of essential activities and supplies that are pragmatic, field-oriented, and, most importantly, immediately life-saving for people in need.Publisher
BioMed CentralPubMed ID
29853989Language
enISSN
1752-1505ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/s13031-018-0157-x
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Minimum initial service package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health in disasters.
- Authors: Lisam S
- Issue date: 2014 Dec
- Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for reproductive health during emergencies: time for a new paradigm?
- Authors: Onyango MA, Hixson BL, McNally S
- Issue date: 2013
- Minimum initial service package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health for women in a displacement setting: a narrative review on the Syrian refugee crisis in Lebanon.
- Authors: Nabulsi D, Abou Saad M, Ismail H, Doumit MAA, El-Jamil F, Kobeissi L, Fouad FM
- Issue date: 2021 Mar 8
- Facilitators and barriers in implementing the Minimum Initial Services Package (MISP) for reproductive health in Nepal post-earthquake.
- Authors: Myers A, Sami S, Onyango MA, Karki H, Anggraini R, Krause S
- Issue date: 2018
- Sea-change in reproductive health in emergencies: how systemic improvements to address the MISP were achieved.
- Authors: Krause SK, Chynoweth SK, Tanabe M
- Issue date: 2017 Nov