Identifying the snake: First scoping review on practices of communities and healthcare providers confronted with snakebite across the world
Journal
PLoS ONEAbstract
BACKGROUND: Snakebite envenoming is a major global health problem that kills or disables half a million people in the world's poorest countries. Biting snake identification is key to understanding snakebite eco-epidemiology and optimizing its clinical management. The role of snakebite victims and healthcare providers in biting snake identification has not been studied globally. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to identify and characterize the practices in biting snake identification across the globe. METHODS: Epidemiological studies of snakebite in humans that provide information on biting snake identification were systematically searched in Web of Science and Pubmed from inception to 2nd February 2019. This search was further extended by snowball search, hand searching literature reviews, and using Google Scholar. Two independent reviewers screened publications and charted the data. RESULTS: We analysed 150 publications reporting 33,827 snakebite cases across 35 countries. On average 70% of victims/bystanders spotted the snake responsible for the bite and 38% captured/killed it and brought it to the healthcare facility. This practice occurred in 30 countries with both fast-moving, active-foraging as well as more secretive snake species. Methods for identifying biting snakes included snake body examination, victim/bystander biting snake description, interpretation of clinical features, and laboratory tests. In nine publications, a picture of the biting snake was taken and examined by snake experts. Snakes were identified at the species/genus level in only 18,065/33,827 (53%) snakebite cases. 106 misidentifications led to inadequate victim management. The 8,885 biting snakes captured and identified were from 149 species including 71 (48%) non-venomous species. CONCLUSION: Snakebite victims and healthcare providers can play a central role in biting snake identification and novel approaches (e.g. photographing the snake, crowdsourcing) could help increase biting snake taxonomy collection to better understand snake ecology and snakebite epidemiology and ultimately improve snakebite management.Publisher
Public Library of SciencePubMed ID
32134964Type
ArticleLanguage
enEISSN
1932-6203ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1371/journal.pone.0229989
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Vulnerability to snakebite envenoming: a global mapping of hotspots.
- Authors: Longbottom J, Shearer FM, Devine M, Alcoba G, Chappuis F, Weiss DJ, Ray SE, Ray N, Warrell DA, Ruiz de Castañeda R, Williams DJ, Hay SI, Pigott DM
- Issue date: 2018 Aug 25
- Snakebite in domestic animals: First global scoping review.
- Authors: Bolon I, Finat M, Herrera M, Nickerson A, Grace D, Schütte S, Babo Martins S, Ruiz de Castañeda R
- Issue date: 2019 Oct 1
- Public perceptions of snakes and snakebite management: implications for conservation and human health in southern Nepal.
- Authors: Pandey DP, Subedi Pandey G, Devkota K, Goode M
- Issue date: 2016 Jun 2
- Ethno-knowledge and attitudes regarding snakebites in the Alto Juruá region, Western Brazilian Amazonia.
- Authors: da Silva AM, Colombini M, Moura-da-Silva AM, de Souza RM, Monteiro WM, Bernarde PS
- Issue date: 2019 Dec 5
- Misidentification of copperhead and cottonmouth snakes following snakebites<sup>.</sup>
- Authors: Cox RD, Parker CS, Cox ECE, Marlin MB, Galli RL
- Issue date: 2018 Dec