Extended use or reuse of single-use surgical masks and filtering face-piece respirators during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: A rapid systematic review.
Authors
Toomey, EConway, Y
Burton, C
Smith, S
Smalle, M
Chan, X
Adisesh, A
Tanveer, S
Ross, L
Thomson, I
Devane, D
Greenhalgh, T
Issue Date
2020-10-08Submitted date
2020-11-04
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Shortages of personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have led to the extended use or reuse of single-use respirators and surgical masks by frontline healthcare workers. The evidence base underpinning such practices warrants examination. Objectives: To synthesize current guidance and systematic review evidence on extended use, reuse, or reprocessing of single-use surgical masks or filtering face-piece respirators. Data sources: We used the World Health Organization, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Public Health England websites to identify guidance. We used Medline, PubMed, Epistemonikos, Cochrane Database, and preprint servers for systematic reviews. Methods: Two reviewers conducted screening and data extraction. The quality of included systematic reviews was appraised using AMSTAR-2. Findings were narratively synthesized. Results: In total, 6 guidance documents were identified. Levels of detail and consistency across documents varied. They included 4 high-quality systematic reviews: 3 focused on reprocessing (decontamination) of N95 respirators and 1 focused on reprocessing of surgical masks. Vaporized hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet germicidal irradiation were highlighted as the most promising reprocessing methods, but evidence on the relative efficacy and safety of different methods was limited. We found no well-established methods for reprocessing respirators at scale. Conclusions: Evidence on the impact of extended use and reuse of surgical masks and respirators is limited, and gaps and inconsistencies exist in current guidance. Where extended use or reuse is being practiced, healthcare organizations should ensure that policies and systems are in place to ensure these practices are carried out safely and in line with available guidance.Publisher
Cambridge University PressPubMed ID
33028441Type
ArticleLanguage
enEISSN
1559-6834ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1017/ice.2020.1243
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Decontamination and reuse of surgical masks and N95 filtering facepiece respirators during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.
- Authors: Seresirikachorn K, Phoophiboon V, Chobarporn T, Tiankanon K, Aeumjaturapat S, Chusakul S, Snidvongs K
- Issue date: 2021 Jan
- Decontamination and reuse of N95 filtering facemask respirators: A systematic review of the literature.
- Authors: Rodriguez-Martinez CE, Sossa-Briceño MP, Cortés JA
- Issue date: 2020 Dec
- N95 reprocessing by low temperature sterilization with 59% vaporized hydrogen peroxide during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic.
- Authors: Jatta M, Kiefer C, Patolia H, Pan J, Harb C, Marr LC, Baffoe-Bonnie A
- Issue date: 2021 Jan
- Gravity steam reprocessing in healthcare facilities for the reuse of N95 respirators.
- Authors: Aljabo A, Mueller E, Abdul-Azeez D, Hoare T, Jain A
- Issue date: 2020 Dec
- Limited Reuse and Extended Use of Filtering Facepiece Respirators.
- Authors: Company Sancho MC, González-María E, Abad-Corpa E
- Issue date: 2021 Feb