Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEibs, T
dc.contributor.authorKoscalova, A
dc.contributor.authorNair, M
dc.contributor.authorGrohma, P
dc.contributor.authorKohler, G
dc.contributor.authorBakhit, RG
dc.contributor.authorThurashvili, M
dc.contributor.authorLasry, E
dc.contributor.authorBauer, SW
dc.contributor.authorJimenez, C
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-19T17:10:26Z
dc.date.available2020-11-19T17:10:26Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-24
dc.date.submitted2020-11-04
dc.identifier.pmid32973055
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036530
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10144/619757
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The objective of this study was to address the knowledge gap regarding antibiotic use in Medecins Sans Frontiéres (MSF) projects located in Africa by exploring antibiotic prescription and consumption habits and their drivers at different healthcare levels. Design: This study used an exploratory study design through thematic analysis of semistructured, in-depth interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs) and field observations in order to understand the main drivers influencing current antibiotics prescription habits and consumption habits of patients in different geographical settings. Setting: The study took place in MSF centres and towns across four countries: Guinea-Bissau, Central African Republic (CAR), Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Sudan. Participants: 384 respondents participated in the study, which includes project staff, prescribers, community members, patients, among other groups. Results: Treatment protocols were physically present in all countries except DRC, but compliance to protocols varied across contexts. A failing health system and barriers to accessing healthcare were perceived as major drivers of overuse and inconsistent prescription practices. Patient demands influenced prescription decisions, and self-medication was commonly reported in the context of failing health systems. Additionally, there was a strong demand for quick cures and communities preferred injections over pills. Patients tended to stop antibiotic treatment once symptoms abated and had major gaps in understanding antibiotic intake instructions and functions. Conclusions: While there were specific findings in each context, the larger trend from these four MSF projects in Africa indicates widespread use of antibiotics based on unclear assumptions, which are often influenced by patient demands. There needs to be a broader focus on the balance between access and excess, especially in such fragile contexts where access to healthcare is a real challenge.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.rightsWith thanks to BMJ Publishing Group.en_US
dc.subjectinfection control
dc.subjectpublic health
dc.subjectqualitative research
dc.titleQualitative study of antibiotic prescription patterns and associated drivers in Sudan, Guinea-Bissau, Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_US
dc.source.journaltitleBMJ open
dc.source.volume10
dc.source.issue9
dc.source.beginpagee036530
dc.source.endpage
refterms.dateFOA2020-11-19T17:10:27Z
dc.source.countryEngland


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Eibs et al 2020 Qualitative study ...
Size:
304.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record