• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • 1 Published Research and Commentary
    • Ebola
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • 1 Published Research and Commentary
    • Ebola
    • View Item
    Mar 06, 2021
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of MSFTitleAuthorsSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsSubjectsPublisherJournal

    Clinical and epidemiological performance of WHO Ebola case definitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Caleo et al 2020 Clinical and ...
    Size:
    866.8Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Authors
    Caleo, G
    Theocharaki, F
    Lokuge, K
    Weiss, HA
    Inamdar, L
    Grandesso, F
    Danis, K
    Pedalino, B
    Kobinger, G
    Sprecher, A
    Greig, J
    Di Tanna, GL
    Show allShow less
    Issue Date
    2020-11-01
    Submitted date
    2021-02-01
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Journal
    The Lancet Infectious Diseases
    Abstract
    Background Ebola virus disease case definition is a crucial surveillance tool to detect suspected cases for referral and as a screening tool for clinicians to support admission and laboratory testing decisions at Ebola health facilities. We aimed to assess the performance of the WHO Ebola virus disease case definitions and other screening scores. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published in English between June 13, 1978, and Jan 14, 2020. We included studies that estimated the sensitivity and specificity of WHO Ebola virus disease case definitions, clinical and epidemiological characteristics (symptoms at admission and contact history), and predictive risk scores against the reference standard (laboratory-confirmed Ebola virus disease). Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated using bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (when four or more studies provided data) or random-effects meta-analysis (fewer than four studies provided data). Findings We identified 2493 publications, of which 14 studies from four countries (Sierra Leone, Guinea, Liberia, and Angola) were included in the analysis. 12 021 people with suspected disease were included, of whom 4874 were confirmed as positive for Ebola virus infection. Six studies explored the performance of WHO case definitions in non-paediatric populations, and in all of these studies, suspected and probable cases were combined and could not be disaggregated for analysis. The pooled sensitivity of the WHO Ebola virus disease case definitions from these studies was 81·5% (95% CI 74·1–87·2) and pooled specificity was 35·7% (28·5–43·6). History of contact or epidemiological link was a key predictor for the WHO case definitions (seven studies) and for risk scores (six studies). The most sensitive symptom was intense fatigue (79·0% [95% CI 74·4–83·0]), assessed in seven studies, and the least sensitive symptom was pain behind the eyes (1·0% [0·0–7·0]), assessed in three studies. The performance of fever as a symptom varied depending on the cutoff used to define fever. Interpretation WHO Ebola virus disease case definitions perform suboptimally to identify cases at both community level and during triage at Ebola health facilities. Inclusion of intense fatigue as a key symptom and contact history could improve the performance of case definitions, but implementation of these changes will require effective collaboration with, and trust of, affected communities.
    Publisher
    Elsevier
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10144/619845
    Language
    en
    Collections
    Ebola

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.